Skip to content
FY2026 GAA: ₱6.79T
PisoScan
DemoFor public education only. These blocks are built by PisoScan from published PhilGEPS records to show how a budget ledger like CADENA would work. No government agency created or signed them, and this is not an official ledger. How it works

Transaction details

API
Transaction action

CITY OF SAN JOSE, NUEVA ECIJA Award a ₱188.8K contract to SERDNA CONSTRUCTIONCities

Transaction hash:
2dfef5eecc934d632876b449770c337806f3f50d58fd486868d1592f8d3d070c
Status:
Included and unchanged
Block:
#76 5,937 blocks after it
Position in block:
Transaction 6 of 61
Award day:
Mar 16, 2007 (19 yrs 7 mo ago)
Value:
₱188,822.00
Project:
Construction of Drainage System

Accountability

Bill Sec. 3 and 19
Accountable officer:
Not stated in the source. PhilGEPS does not publish who certified the award.
Certification:
Not certified No agency signed this record. Under CADENA the accountable officer would sign it with their own key.
Demo signature:
Block #76 signature valid Demo key, proves nothing about the governmentPublic key

Linked records: from budget to payment

Bill Sec. 5
  1. 1. Appropriation
    GAA line item · Sec. 5(b)
    The award does not say which budget line pays for it.
    Not published
  2. 2. Allotment release
    SARO / allotment · Sec. 5(c)(iii)
    Not published per project. DBM releases SAROs, but not linked to individual contracts.
    Not published
  3. 3. Cash allocation
    Notice of Cash Allocation · Sec. 5(c)(iv)
    Not published per project.
    Not published
  4. 4. Contract award
    Notice of Award (PhilGEPS) · Sec. 5(d)
    CITY OF SAN JOSE, NUEVA ECIJA awarded it to SERDNA CONSTRUCTION on 2007-03-16.
    Found
  5. 5. Contract & progress
    Contract / progress report (DPWH) · Sec. 5(d)
    No matching DPWH contract record (only DPWH contracts are listed with progress).
    Not published
  6. 6. Payment
    Disbursement voucher · Sec. 5(c)(viii)
    Not published. No public source shows how much of this contract has been paid.
    Not published
  7. 7. Completion
    Certificate of completion · Sec. 5(d)
    No completion certificate published.
    Not published
  8. 8. Audit
    COA annual audit report · Sec. 5(e)(iii)
    COA's CY2024 audit of San Jose City gave a "unmodified" opinion on its financial statements (not specific to this contract).
    Partly

1 of 8 documents found, 1 partly. Under CADENA every step would be published within 7 working days and linked to this record.

Tamper test: try changing this record

Demo

Edit the amount as if someone quietly changed the record. Your browser re-hashes it and walks up the chain. Nothing is saved.

  1. 1. Record fingerprint changed
    stored   2dfef5eecc…3d070cnow      …
  2. 2. Block Merkle root changed
    stored   b5ed634945…87cd15now      …
  3. 3. Block #76 hash changed
    stored   5de2979165…421addnow      …
Chain intact. The record matches its fingerprint, so the block and every block after it still line up.

Merkle proof (6 steps)

How this one record is tied to the block's Merkle root, without needing the other 60 records. Each step hashes the current value together with the sibling shown.

  1. leaf  2dfef5eecc934d632876b449770c337806f3f50d58fd486868d1592f8d3d070c
  2. 01 R 31dd8cc2b000ac1c3e1633ac22682b39a1b7f1bea54f3a5076fdfa8a27c19b0b
  3. 02 L 60ab6e9c66307c9895e74caf0ceb5229dd3e25fc38e74435aaa89fbd62a6ec66
  4. 03 L d5d87e99e2d1891bdfa0d128bcd579d4a63dfb21487e6eabbd92b458d87c9b18
  5. 04 R da5fe0b069f025c9bc3c6c9a9042ca6d68bddc82f0743dfc3309fbd34a938d4f
  6. 05 R f04ecba7b9f9fdd591e0b7aebbe3e07710b9d33894f3dcc56d6619f1040da437
  7. 06 R 1c980d0cda943d902bf9b90c398d65a66c6ab5f06011ba43bf859d86607c7701
  8. root  b5ed634945f561a6d77f706acabbc2d2f60cd4210901a1cecf1cdd78f687cd15