Skip to content
FY2026 GAA: ₱6.79T
PisoScan
DemoFor public education only. These blocks are built by PisoScan from published PhilGEPS records to show how a budget ledger like CADENA would work. No government agency created or signed them, and this is not an official ledger. How it works

Transaction details

API
Transaction action

MUNICIPALITY OF LICAB, NUEVA ECIJA Award a ₱389.5K contract to E.P. DE GUZMAN CONSULTING ENGINEER CONTRACTORMunicipalities

Transaction hash:
463ba8e6f9cef8fc3de0200ea698429bd929206d2a8e7065411e5b29ee9dac9e
Status:
Included and unchanged
Block:
#2,798 3,215 blocks after it
Position in block:
Transaction 36 of 140
Award day:
Jul 20, 2016 (10 yrs 3 mo ago)
Value:
₱389,502.00
Project:
BIDDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION

Accountability

Bill Sec. 3 and 19
Accountable officer:
Not stated in the source. PhilGEPS does not publish who certified the award.
Certification:
Not certified No agency signed this record. Under CADENA the accountable officer would sign it with their own key.
Demo signature:
Block #2,798 signature valid Demo key, proves nothing about the governmentPublic key

Linked records: from budget to payment

Bill Sec. 5
  1. 1. Appropriation
    GAA line item · Sec. 5(b)
    The award does not say which budget line pays for it.
    Not published
  2. 2. Allotment release
    SARO / allotment · Sec. 5(c)(iii)
    Not published per project. DBM releases SAROs, but not linked to individual contracts.
    Not published
  3. 3. Cash allocation
    Notice of Cash Allocation · Sec. 5(c)(iv)
    Not published per project.
    Not published
  4. 4. Contract award
    Notice of Award (PhilGEPS) · Sec. 5(d)
    MUNICIPALITY OF LICAB, NUEVA ECIJA awarded it to E.P. DE GUZMAN CONSULTING ENGINEER CONTRACTOR on 2016-07-20.
    Found
  5. 5. Contract & progress
    Contract / progress report (DPWH) · Sec. 5(d)
    No matching DPWH contract record (only DPWH contracts are listed with progress).
    Not published
  6. 6. Payment
    Disbursement voucher · Sec. 5(c)(viii)
    Not published. No public source shows how much of this contract has been paid.
    Not published
  7. 7. Completion
    Certificate of completion · Sec. 5(d)
    No completion certificate published.
    Not published
  8. 8. Audit
    COA annual audit report · Sec. 5(e)(iii)
    COA's CY2024 audit of Licab gave a "qualified" opinion on its financial statements (not specific to this contract).
    Partly

1 of 8 documents found, 1 partly. Under CADENA every step would be published within 7 working days and linked to this record.

Tamper test: try changing this record

Demo

Edit the amount as if someone quietly changed the record. Your browser re-hashes it and walks up the chain. Nothing is saved.

  1. 1. Record fingerprint changed
    stored   463ba8e6f9…9dac9enow      …
  2. 2. Block Merkle root changed
    stored   6f16734b1b…652be5now      …
  3. 3. Block #2798 hash changed
    stored   72a387cea9…12f21cnow      …
Chain intact. The record matches its fingerprint, so the block and every block after it still line up.

Merkle proof (8 steps)

How this one record is tied to the block's Merkle root, without needing the other 139 records. Each step hashes the current value together with the sibling shown.

  1. leaf  463ba8e6f9cef8fc3de0200ea698429bd929206d2a8e7065411e5b29ee9dac9e
  2. 01 R 478a0e03a5a29e8b85a70836025393c2fcf1fba7599557c8e135654d9108a297
  3. 02 R f5f29e50e5c03f41c8402e3335383f3c1f64fb941ed854bcf4462123da0faeff
  4. 03 L 7bdda6b67796b274233e30ebd252b66c6ab2402f8f2e781f4b344b6047994467
  5. 04 R 2407f5cb164593373f76a3f475d87b4d94b43803ea2a56ba54d930858c090f20
  6. 05 R 6456ace5bae58cca1ec3d5d1ab16e149040bfeb91f12bdf5ef26d39592c2bb23
  7. 06 L b485cbdd591f748fa13a14b4161ca7670eee9dcddc8d57f49dc978f8aa0a600e
  8. 07 R 3de56fa015514fba484f5843c83e0f5622859d49ca28e3f3766339f9fa20ff3c
  9. 08 R b92db6fbb7456462d6d783ec4115b9f6c82362e7a705c0a0e6c1ef0f806f796c
  10. root  6f16734b1b589351c35a613e763c44dd8c66dad569d9fe95b53eac1f07652be5