Skip to content
FY2026 GAA: ₱6.79T
PisoScan
DemoFor public education only. These blocks are built by PisoScan from published PhilGEPS records to show how a budget ledger like CADENA would work. No government agency created or signed them, and this is not an official ledger. How it works

Transaction details

API
Transaction action

CITY OF SAN JOSE, NUEVA ECIJA Award a ₱8.0M contract to F.C. MARTINEZ CONSTRUCTIONCities

Transaction hash:
f4823bf5c3f9fb24e98fdbbc9d588b23f28e696013395954d71c5c098353aaa7
Status:
Included and unchanged
Block:
#3,033 2,980 blocks after it
Position in block:
Transaction 267 of 277
Award day:
Mar 31, 2017 (9 yrs 7 mo ago)
Value:
₱7,953,476.35
Project:
Construction Project

Accountability

Bill Sec. 3 and 19
Accountable officer:
Not stated in the source. PhilGEPS does not publish who certified the award.
Certification:
Not certified No agency signed this record. Under CADENA the accountable officer would sign it with their own key.
Demo signature:
Block #3,033 signature valid Demo key, proves nothing about the governmentPublic key

Linked records: from budget to payment

Bill Sec. 5
  1. 1. Appropriation
    GAA line item · Sec. 5(b)
    The award does not say which budget line pays for it.
    Not published
  2. 2. Allotment release
    SARO / allotment · Sec. 5(c)(iii)
    Not published per project. DBM releases SAROs, but not linked to individual contracts.
    Not published
  3. 3. Cash allocation
    Notice of Cash Allocation · Sec. 5(c)(iv)
    Not published per project.
    Not published
  4. 4. Contract award
    Notice of Award (PhilGEPS) · Sec. 5(d)
    CITY OF SAN JOSE, NUEVA ECIJA awarded it to F.C. MARTINEZ CONSTRUCTION on 2017-03-31.
    Found
  5. 5. Contract & progress
    Contract / progress report (DPWH) · Sec. 5(d)
    No matching DPWH contract record (only DPWH contracts are listed with progress).
    Not published
  6. 6. Payment
    Disbursement voucher · Sec. 5(c)(viii)
    Not published. No public source shows how much of this contract has been paid.
    Not published
  7. 7. Completion
    Certificate of completion · Sec. 5(d)
    No completion certificate published.
    Not published
  8. 8. Audit
    COA annual audit report · Sec. 5(e)(iii)
    COA's CY2024 audit of San Jose City gave a "unmodified" opinion on its financial statements (not specific to this contract).
    Partly

1 of 8 documents found, 1 partly. Under CADENA every step would be published within 7 working days and linked to this record.

Tamper test: try changing this record

Demo

Edit the amount as if someone quietly changed the record. Your browser re-hashes it and walks up the chain. Nothing is saved.

  1. 1. Record fingerprint changed
    stored   f4823bf5c3…53aaa7now      …
  2. 2. Block Merkle root changed
    stored   b5bbf226d5…1b01dbnow      …
  3. 3. Block #3033 hash changed
    stored   05f3f55d7b…d396f9now      …
Chain intact. The record matches its fingerprint, so the block and every block after it still line up.

Merkle proof (9 steps)

How this one record is tied to the block's Merkle root, without needing the other 276 records. Each step hashes the current value together with the sibling shown.

  1. leaf  f4823bf5c3f9fb24e98fdbbc9d588b23f28e696013395954d71c5c098353aaa7
  2. 01 L f3a4eb249bc7b53abff3b6a5e8563ec2d8fcbf7efdb6a025ee30231038d40259
  3. 02 L 77144b89d30c8fe48f1d4b9910620685c15ba19ed3eab3fbdd928c8c905b0404
  4. 03 R 97a6769954acbbda38b4c166419eee553bc9f95e1077db38cdcdfa282308b3a8
  5. 04 L ac3608c5d8a75b54d8e2ef2a0527b32d7328116930ea25b4a82e41136e437d78
  6. 05 R 3ef2735de5046bee9d3f4964ca6c5f8b572ca70d3740e7a8bf82d8c523b2e2ed
  7. 06 R 1f395baf2d3108eba302b9e804c1d8bd95a018481cc51d47543f9f6f84ef059b
  8. 07 R e910accaad6603d4e901e72c20561f6bf9690dfbffc4e29c88a5927ba0e2f7ee
  9. 08 R 1dca9876bbf7b43a4ce1524a61e4f94c3d448e9eafc92f6d8957b2e37c7da2bc
  10. 09 L 99d35b036f5e91100347ad7a0a3fbdfe848d1766166d59728143ea998aa9818c
  11. root  b5bbf226d540529db4a1c190017ae80facebabb254fae74143236dab9b1b01db